Protected areas in the Slovakian Carpathians: the transition to participation
- What is the best way to compile baseline data on nature, the economy, and society and harness it on behalf of concrete activities in and around protected areas?
- How can a workable regional-development concept be created that brings together conservationists, different state agencies, and local populations?
- How can local initiatives be promoted that make use of natural resources in protected areas, but do not harm the environment?
- How can better labelling of local products, increased market access, eco- and cultural tourism, trekking routes, and hunting benefit local development and local income generation?
- Finally, how can the boundaries of large protected areas be redrawn and improved to better reflect local realities? These boundaries must conserve natural values yet enable local development and job creation in areas characterised by outmigration, aging populations, and lack of employment.
The project will provide baseline assessments of selected protected areas, including ecological, social, and economic indicators. University partners in Slovakia (Banska Bystrica and Zilina) and Switzerland (Bern) are jointly carrying out the assessments. However, the project goes far beyond research: Thanks to a joint Slovak–Swiss financing mechanism, Slovak partners will implement small projects – or “seed money” activities – proposed by local stakeholders. These small projects will hopefully result in tangible, lasting benefits for local stakeholders – particularly farmers – in and around protected areas.
The result may be new and better forms of cooperation between the SNC, local protected-area authorities, and local populations, enabling a more grounded approach to conservation and greater acceptance of nature-conservation goals among residents. Finally, Slovak mountain farmers stand to benefit from more realistic outreach activities and a greater stake in “their“ protected area. Or, as one senior SNC staff member put it: “After decades of top-down definition of protected areas, and [subsequent privatisation] of agricultural lands and pastures after 1990, we really need a transition to participation to [better balance] nature conservation [goals] and local benefits.“