Expansion of cropland is one of the main drivers of deforestation – especially in the tropics. Deforestation not only releases carbon into the atmosphere, but also leads to loss of biodiversity and ecosystems, harming their vital functions.
Particularly important in this context are so-called flex crops like soy, palm oil, and sugar cane, which are used both for direct human consumption and for animal fodder or industrial purposes. Prior studies suggest that cultivation of oil plants – like oil palm or soy – accounts for about 25% of emissions from deforestation worldwide. The flex crop boom is the result of various global socio-economic developments – among them rising inequality. However, the influence of investments by the ultra-rich has so far remained largely unexplored.
Concentrated wealth linked to flex crop expansion
A new study conducted by Graziano Ceddia at the University of Bern’s Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) takes a pioneering look at how agricultural investment by the super-rich impacts the spread of flex crops in the global South. Examining 21 countries in Latin America and Southeast Asia between 1991 and 2014, the study indicates that increasing wealth among super-rich individuals correlates strongly with increasing inflows of foreign direct investment in agriculture in both regions – thus driving expansion of flex crops.
The study also suggests that global investors were attracted to agriculture by the promise of high returns. “Private investors are investing their capital in the agricultural sector in the global South because returns on traditional investments have declined,” says study author Graziano Ceddia.
Taken together, the results indicate that growing concentration of wealth in a few private hands has played a crucial role in the expansion of cropland and deforestation in the global South. According to the research, which has just been published in Nature Sustainability, a 1% increase in the wealth of the super-rich led to a 2.4–10% increase in the area under flex crops during the period studied.
Wealth inequality is even more important than income inequality
“The results underscore the importance of studying the impact of inequality on the environment – and not only of income inequality, but also of wealth inequality,” says Ceddia. According to the researcher, it was surplus private wealth that first enabled large-scale private investment in agriculture. He further emphasizes that wealth is much more unequally distributed than income. “The study clearly shows that we must reduce inequality in order to minimize environmental risks”, says Ceddia. Overall, this new research highlights the need to increase studies on the links between unequal wealth distribution, investments, and environmental degradation.
